“How the MSM handed Hamas a PR victory.”
This is the problem with fanatical partisans like HR, they simply can’t accept that media coverage which creates a negative impression is a function of the events themselves, rather than media perfidy. Hence the following contortions as HR desperately tries to shoot the messenger.
"A 'cycle of violence'?"
I’ve no idea what the quotes are meant to indicate as HR attribute the quote to no-one.
HR attack AP for a summary of recent events that begins,
It started last week with what
Why did the media fail to add the vital context? Since Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in mid-June 2007 until the end of December 2007, 475 missiles and 631 mortars were fired at Sderot and the surrounding region
But as usual, HR were being very careful with the editing to fit the story they want to tell. These are the 2 preceding sentences from the AP article that HR conveniently omitted,
Yet, a more relaxed
"Who turned off the lights?"
And this is just rehash. HR can’t even find any evil media stories to demonstrate this, but just quote the esteemed Jerusalem Post ruminating on the blackout conspiracy.
Again, HR seek to strenuously avoid the basic facts to look for storms in tiny tea cups. And the basic fact is that
"A 'spontaneous breakout'?"
The confected allegations are now straining credulity, even for the idiots at HR.
Again we have quotes in the headline from HR, but the phrase “spontaneous breakout” doesn’t appear in the Telegraph story HR is criticising, which is about a betrothed couple who can now wed. They had been separated due to the closure of the Rafah crossing. Good to see HR tackling hard-nosed journalism in its media ‘critiques’.
That’s hard to beat for dishonesty. If any of the media that HR likes to criticise tried a stunt like that, HRs shrill denunciations would be long and loud.
" 'Starving' Palestinians and a humanitarian crisis?"
Hamas and the media conveyed the distinct impression of a humanitarian crisis as
So how many examples does HR provide of media reports claiming that Palestinians are "starving”. Zero. I think it’s safe to assume that is because that's how many they could find.
What crude sophists this lot are. Even Orwell would have trouble believing the extent of their mendacity.
To cap it all off, HR amazingly ask,
"Will the media relent?"
From what exactly, is not clear. Perhaps from not saying the kind of things that HR would wish they would say so they could accuse the media of anti-Israel basis, and so forcing HR to make it all up?